Truth

Bitter ex-spouses who
alienate children
from THEIR other parent
are the MOST EVIL
of ALL people.

A Discussion with the Child of Parental Alienation. A video series. Awesome! Dr. Childress, the Counselor.

If your child is old enough to understand the concepts of survival and normal behavior, then share the following video series with them.  This direct and non-confrontational approach of counseling the child of pathogenic parenting by Dr. Childress is filled with insight for the child of parental alienation.  

 

 

Understanding How Parental Alienation Occurs is Helpful and Provides Clear Direction in Resolving this Destructive Pathology.

18425048_1031980323605116_6739015013127197411_n

AB-PA is not the Moon

by drcraigchildress

This is about professional competence.  All we are seeking is basic professional competence.

If a mental health professional is assessing, diagnosing, and treating an attachment-related pathology surrounding divorce, it is incumbent upon that professional to be professionally competent in the attachment system, what the attachment system is, how it functions, and how it characteristically dysfunctions.

If a mental health professional is assessing, diagnosing, and treating personality disorder pathology that is being expressed in the family, it is incumbent upon that professional to be professionally competent in the origins of personality pathology, its characteristic display, and the influence of parental personality pathology on family relationships.

If a mental health professional is assessing, diagnosing, and treating family pathology, it is incumbent upon that professional to be professionally competent in the family systems constructs of homeostasis, triangulation, and coalitions.

This is just a matter of basic professional competence.  We are just asking for basic professional competence.

AB-PA is not a new theory.  AB-PA is simply a return to the standard and fully established, fully accepted, scientifically validated constructs and principles of professional psychology.  It may seem “new” to some, but that’s only because they are ignorant of the standard and established, scientifically supported and scientifically validated constructs and principles of professional psychology.

If someone asks you for the peer reviewed research for AB-PA, give them my 40-page reference list.  That is the peer reviewed research for AB-PA.

Dr. Childress AB-PA reference list

Anyone who is asking for the “peer reviewed research” for AB-PA is simply exposing their ignorance for the standard, peer reviewed, and fully established information in professional psychology – Bowlby, Beck, Millon, Minuchin, and on and on.

Q:  “Dr. Childress, where in your reference list does it talk about AB-PA?”

On page 80 in Bowlby’s 1980 book on the attachment system and loss;

“The deactivation of attachment behavior is a key feature of certain common variants of pathological mourning.” (Bowlby, 1980, p. 70)

Based on the work of Bowlby – BASED on the work of Bowlby – AB-PA says that the child’s rejection of the parent is a variant of “pathological mourning” with the allied parent and child surrounding the divorce.

Q:  “AB-PA links the child’s rejection of the targeted parent – the “deactivation of attachment behavior” – to the personality disorder pathology of the parent.  Where in your reference list does it talk about the linkage of personality pathology to pathological mourning?”

On page 217 of his book on loss and mourning, Bowlby (1980) links disordered mourning to disturbances in personality formation.

“Disturbances of personality, which include a bias to respond to loss with disordered mourning, are seen as the outcome of one or more deviations in development that can originate or grow worse during any of the years of infancy, childhood and adolescence.” (Bowlby, 1980, p. 217)

In the separate field of personality disorder pathology, Kernberg (one of the preeminent figures in narcissistic and borderline personality pathology) links the pathology of the narcissistic personality to disordered mourning;

“They [narcissists] are especially deficient in genuine feelings of sadness and mournful longing; their incapacity for experiencing depressive reactions is a basic feature of their personalities.  When abandoned or disappointed by other people they may show what on the surface looks like depression, but which on further examination emerges as anger and resentment, loaded with revengeful wishes, rather than real sadness for the loss of a person whom they appreciated.” (Kernberg, 1977, p. 229)

AB-PA isn’t me, it’s Bowlby and Kernberg who said these things.  I didn’t say these things.  Bowlby said these things.  Kernberg said these things.  Not me.

Asking for peer-reviewed research for AB-PA is asking for the peer-reviewed research of Bowlby and Kernberg, and Beck, and Millon.  Bowlby said these things, not me.  If you have a problem with AB-PA, take it up with Bowlby because he’s the one who said it.

AB-PA is the finger pointing at the moon, it is not the moon.

AB-PA says that the pathology of a child’s rejection of a parent following divorce is called a “cross-generational coalition.”  I didn’t say this, Salvador Minuchin says this;

“An inappropriately rigid cross-generational subsystem of mother and son versus father appears, and the boundary around this coalition of mother and son excludes the father.  A cross-generational dysfunctional transactional pattern has developed.” (Minuchin, 1974, p. 61-62)

“The parents were divorced six months earlier and the father is now living alone… Two of the children who were very attached to their father, now refuse any contact with him.  The younger children visit their father but express great unhappiness with the situation.” (Minuchin, 1974, p. 101)

“The boundary between the parental subsystem and the child becomes diffuse, and the boundary around the parents-child triad, which should be diffuse, becomes inappropriately rigid.  This type of structure is called a rigid triangle… The rigid triangle can also take the form of a stable coalition.  One of the parents joins the child in a rigidly bounded cross-generational coalition against the other parent.” (Minuchin, 1974, p. 102)

I didn’t say this.  Minuchin said this.  If you have a problem with AB-PA, don’t take it up with me, take it up with Minuchin because he’s the one saying it.  If you want peer-reviewed research, then ask Minuchin for the peer-reviewed research for what he says, because he’s the one saying it.

This isn’t me saying this, this is Bowlby and Kernberg and Minuchin saying this.  AB-PA is nothing new.  It’s all just standard and established knowledge in professional psychology.

It only SEEMS new to some people because they are ignorant.  They don’t know Bowlby, and Kernberg, and Millon, and Haley, and Minuchin.  Because if they have this knowledge – this standard and established knoweldge from professional psychology – then they know the scientifically established ground for AB-PA.

If AB-PA as a construct vanished tomorrow, it would still be here.  Bowlby, Beck, Kernberg, Minuchin, Haley.  Nothing new.

The psychological fusion between the child and the allied parent, the “enmeshed” relationship, the shared psychological state of the child and the allied parent, that’s described by the preeminent researchers in psychological development and the neuro-development of the brain, Daniel Stern and Edward Tronick;

“Our nervous systems are constructed to be captured by the nervous systems of others.  Our intentions are modified or born in a shifting dialogue with the felt intentions of others.  Our feelings are shaped by the intentions, thoughts, and feelings of others.  And our thoughts are cocreated in dialogue, even when it is only with ourselves.  In short, our mental life is cocreated. This continuous cocreative dialogue with other minds is what I am calling the intersubjective matrix.” (Stern, 2004, p. 76)

“In response to their partner’s relational moves each individual attempts to adjust their behavior to maintain a coordinated dyadic state or to repair a mismatch.  When mutual regulation is particularly successful, that is when the age-appropriate forms of meaning (e.g., affects, relational intentions, representations) from one individual’s state of consciousness are coordinated with the meanings of another’s state of consciousness — I have hypothesized that a dyadic state of consciousness emerges. (Tronick, p. 475, 2003)

This isn’t me saying this, this is Stern and Tronick saying this.  If you have a problem with this, take it up with Stern and Tronick, they have a massive research base of evidence supporting their statements.

AB-PA is not Dr. Childress, it’s not “new.”  AB-PA is all just standard and scientifically established knowledge in professional psychology.  Want the peer reviewed research for AB-PA.  Sure, no problem:

Dr. Childress AB-PA reference list

I’ve made it even easier.  For anyone who asking about peer reviewed research support for AB-PA. on my website is a Checklist of Component Pathology.  Simply identify what part of AB-PA you’d like more peer reviewed research support for, and I’d be glad to provide it.

If they’d like the peer-reviewed support for all of AB-PB:

AB-PA Reference List

All we are asking for is professional competence in standard and established areas of professional psychology.  That’s all.

That’s not a lot to ask for, competence.  Basic competence.

In fact, professional competence is a right of all clients that is guaranteed to them by all professional ethics codes.  Professionally competent assessment, diagnosis, and treatment is the RIGHT of all targeted parents and their children (Standard 2.01a of the APA ethics code).

AB-PA is leading us out of the world of mythical “new forms” of pathology and we are returning to the path of scientifically established constructs and principles of professional psychology.  No unicorns, no mermaid songs.  We are returning to the world of science and professional psychology.

The data sets from Bowlby, Beck, Millon, Kernberg, Linehan, Minuchin, Haley, Bowen, Stern, Tronick, van der Kolk and the surrounding scientific literature can fully describe and solve the attachment-related pathology of a child rejecting a parent surrounding divorce.

We don’t need “new and unique” forms of pathologies.  We are returning to established professional practice, we are returning to a scientific professionally established ground.  No unicorns, no mermaid songs.

AB-PA is established fact.  Why?  Because there is no such thing as AB-PA.  It is Bowlby, and Millon, and Beck, and Haley, and Minuchin, and Kernberg and all of the already scientifically established fact of professional psychology.  Poof.  There is no AB-PA, there is only Bowlby, and Beck, and Kernberg, and…

The finger pointing at the moon is not the moon.

Jason Hoffer completely understands:

From Jason Hoffer: “AB-PA is not the solution. The PAS mindset is “one model to solve them all,” but that is not what AB-PA brings to the table.

The solution is the psychological knowledge behind AB-PA.  Attachment theory, family systems theory, personality disorders, all of it.  When a therapist has all of that knowledge they can use all of it to make whatever diagnosis is necessary, whether it leads to AB-PA or something else.

The usefulness of the knowledge behind AB-PA far, far outweighs the usefulness of AB-PA itself.  If you were to have a therapist study everything found in the reference section of “Foundations”, but not read “Foundations” itself, I guarantee they’ll be able to make the right diagnosis that child psychological abuse is taking place.  That’s the beauty of it.  The finger pointing at the moon is not the moon.  The solution to PA is not AB-PA.  AB-PA points to the solution, but it is not the solution in-and-of itself.

The real solution is having therapists with a deep understanding of all of the psychological components that make up AB-PA.  Whether they *use* AB-PA itself or not doesn’t really matter.  All AB-PA provides is a well-thought out way to use all that knowledge to make a certain specific type of diagnosis.  So, AB-PA may not account for all the subtler cases, but the knowledge required to use AB-PA certainly does, and then some.”

You are absolutely 100% correct Jason.  You get it.  That is spot-on 100% accurate.

There is absolutely zero reason why all mental health professionals everywhere should not join us in our call for all mental health professionals to be professionally competent in the standard and established, fully accepted, fully scientifically validated constructs and principles of professional psychology.

There is no AB-PA.  The finger pointing at the moon is not the moon.

“Look everyone… the moon” (Bowlby, Beck, Millon, Kernberg, Minuchin, Haley…)

Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. NY: Basic.

Kernberg, O.F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism.. New York: Aronson.

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Harvard University Press.

Stern, D. (2004). The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. (emphasis added)

Tronick, E.Z. (2003). Of course all relationships are unique: How co-creative processes generate unique mother-infant and patient-therapist relationships and change other relationships. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 473-491.

drcraigchildress | September 8, 2017 at 3:13 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p4JU8D-F8I

An APA endorsed study shows that child psychological abuse is as harmful as child sexual abuse. 

Welcome and Key Points about Parental Alienation

Definition of Parental Alienation: one parent manipulates a child to reject the other parent (or a step parent or grandparent or etc does the manipulation.)  See also, frequently asked questions(answers to common criticisms and complaints). See also support groups in Ohio and around the world.
 

Greatest Victories in the Fight Against the Form of Child Abuse known as Parental Alienation:

    1. ATTACHMENT-BASED PARENTAL ALIENATION (PATHOGENIC PARENTING): Dr. Childress has provided rigorous diagnostic criteria for severe parental alienation that rule out other forms of child abuse and exposure to domestic violence. Read a summary of pathogenic parenting that shows that severe parental alienation is simply a manifestation of well understood pathologies.  An alienator creates an imaginary delusion for themselves, their children, and the community that the OTHER parent is inadequate. This allows them to hide from personal fears of inadequacy / abandonment. This defeats the “junk science” argument and makes therapists accountable under state law for understanding it and diagnosing it as child psychological abuse.
    2.  Another differential diagnosis tool is the Parental Acceptance Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ), which measures splitting. See also the BSQ for adults.
    3. DSM-5: The authors of DSM-5 explain that parental alienation is included in DSM-5 as child abuse (V995.51). The tired argument that “it’s not a syndrome” is invalid, irrelevant, dead, and misleading. Read insightful quotes from the authors of DSM-5. Send a copy of their paper to every under-informed mental health professional, along with some of their best quotes.
    4. ICD-11: The phrase “parental alienation” appears in ICD-11.
    5. ICD-10: ICD-10, the version currently in use, retains “shared delusional disorder,” which is an uncannily accurate description of parental alienation.
    6. APA:

  1. AAP: The American Academy of Pediatrics has provided guidance to doctors on treating parental alienation
  2. APSAC: The American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC) has included parental alienation in its 2017 Practice Guidelines for the Investigation and Determination of Suspected Psychological Maltreatment of Children and Adolescents
  3. IT’S EMPIRICAL: Over 6 empirical, peer reviewed studies show that parental alienation is child psychological abuse.
  4. MEDIA: ABC 2020 Exposed Parental Alienation,  as did the BBC60 minutesCNN, and Canadian TV , People Magazine , and the Marshall Project
  5. TOP HOSPITAL WEIGHED IN: The top us psychiatric hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) notes in its “Massachusetts General Clinical Psychiatry Guide” that “confining or withholding of interactions with other caregiver” is child psychological abuse (V995.51).
  6. VICTIMS SPEAK OUT:  Formerly Alienated Teens and Formerly Alienated Adults have spoken out, telling how it happens, how they were fooled and manipulated, including about 40 incredible videos from Ryan Thomas  that explain how he was tricked and explain the perspective of the alienated child.
  7. WIDESPREAD CHILD ABUSE13.4% of parents say they are alienated from a child, per a survey of 610 adults in North Carolina. About 10 million US parents say the  alienation is severe.
  8. PARENTAL ALIENATION IS GENDER NEUTRAL:   The studies are done. The numbers are in. The number of male and female alienators are approximately equal.
  9. DoJ: The United States Department of Justice says that “damaging one’s relationship with his or her children” is domestic violence.
  10. Effective treatments exist:   See what treatments for parental alienation work and which don’t .  You would simply never know that highly effective treatments exist because 99% of the time people prescribe treatments that rarely work.
  11. THE LITTLE APA: The “American Psychiatric Association Textbook of Personality Disorders” perfectly describes disordered parenting and parental alienation.
  12. THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN’S KIDS: The head of the British child protection agency CAFCASS, Mr. Anthony Douglas, said “It’s undoubtedly a form of neglect or child abuse” and in a March 2017 debate in Parliament, Simon Danczuk said “Parental alienation is another form of child abuse that has gone both unreported and under-discussed.”

Greatest Parental Alienation Awareness Videos of all Time:

Parental Alienation Caught on Video

The Best 7 Minute Video Description of Parental Alienation

Aimee Nichols, age 18, explains the perspective of a teen

Memories of a Monster – 24 Min instructional video based on an episode of desperate housewives

First of 40 amazing videos explains the perspective of the alienated child

Two and a half minutes of training for divorcing parents. Alienators break all these rules due to complex psychological issues

60 Minutes Exposes Parental Alienation

The Best 47 Second Video Description of Parental Alienation



Dr. Harmon, APA Divisions 8, 9, 38. Parenting Stereotypes

Dr. Warshak is interviewed by a Family Court Judge

Dr. Childress: Child Psychological Abuse V995.51

Dr. Childress: Diagnosis and Treatment

Tamra Judge Alienated Child and Now Erased Mother

Ron Berglas

Jennifer Harman – PA as intimate partner violence

Several Real Life Examples of PA

Dr. Childress answers questions for two hours

3 Adults tell their stories in a 35 minute documentary

Erasing Dad (Borrando a Papa) 80 min documentary

Alienated Daughter Speaks Out

Alienated Teen Reunites

Alabama Teen Speaks Out

Dr. Miller, 26 min version

Dr. Miller, 7 minute version

==============================================================

 
 
Parental Alienation Caught on Camera: an erasing parent “supervises” a conversation between child and soon to be erased parent. Click here to see this picture. Question: is that child getting the message that a relationship with the other parent is not encouraged? Question: is that child going to feel comfortable relating to the soon to be erased parent? Does the erasing parent somehow feel that the other parent is somehow unsafe, unloving, or unavailable, and is the erasing parent communicating that to the child? Will the child feel tremendous pressure just to block the other parent out of his/her life?

Overview and Introduction

People who are in a position to see parental alienation most often know it is real.  In a survey at the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts in 2010, 98% of 300 respondents agreed with the question “Do you think that some children are manipulated by one parent to irrationally and unjustifiably reject the other parent.”   [Lorandos, D., W. Benet and S.R. Sauber (2013). Overview of Parental Alienation. In Lorandos, D., W. Bernet and S.R. Sauber (2013) Parental alienation. The Handbook for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Charles C Thomas, Springfield.]

Parental alienation can be defined it as “undermining and interfering with the normal child parent bond.” [paawareness.org]  “Parental alienation is the term used to describe a family dynamic in which on parent (referred to as the alienating or favored parent) engages in behaviors (referred to as alienation strategies) to foster a child’s unjustified rejection of and disaffection for the other parent (referred to as the rejected or targeted parent”   [Baker, Amy, Surviving Parental Alienation]

Through alienation strategies, such as denigration of the other parent and limiting a child’s contact with the other parent, a targeting parent is able to make a child feel rejected by the targeted parent, causing the child to treat the targeted parent with behavior normally reserved for one’s worst enemy.   Counter-intuitively, the child aligns with the parent that does not have their best interest in mind.  “Parental behaviors that seem particularly ripe for exploitation by the other parent have to do with money, remarriage, and moving out of the family home.” [Amy Baker, “Co-parenting with a toxic ex”]

When a social worker or counselor or neighbor hears a litany of complaints from one parent that appear to be confirmed exactly by each of the children involved, it is natural to assume that they are telling the truth, unless a detailed and disciplined investigation is conducted.   [Amy Baker, “Working with Alienated Children and Families: A Clinical Guidebook”.]   An incorrect assessment only serves to reinforce the misunderstanding of the exploited child.

Alienated children can suffer from depression, lack of trust, anger, and self-hatred, and substance abuse. [Amy Baker, “Adult Survivors of Parental Alienation”]

Targeted parents may be baffled and ashamed, while targeting parents may be angry or jealous and may suffer from a personality disorder.

However, all children deserve to be loved by both parents and to be able to love them in return.

Saramento Family Court News Description, April 18, 2014: Parental alienation is a social dynamic where one parent sabotages the relationship of the other parent with the child – sometimes euphemistically called ‘aggressive parenting’  This happens physically by boycotting or “hijacking” any contact between them, but also psychologically by bullying the other parent away and by brainwashing the child. This will lead up to a situation where ultimately the child itself expresses unjustified hatred or unreasonably strong dislike of one parent, making access by the rejected parent even more difficult or impossible The alienating parent can now hide very well that he/she was solely responsible for this destruction of the relationship with the other parent, and the crime is complete: the child has lost a parent and grandparents.

Huffington Post, 5/26/2015 by Traci Slatton, “The child basically constructs an alternate reality where the parent is some kind of monster. There’s no longer any sense of the parent as a human being with the ordinary nuances of the gray scale, or as a good-enough parent; the parent’s actions and statements are twisted, distorted, and massaged to “prove” that the parent is unworthy of contact.”

Psychology Today Blog, 5/2/2013 by Edward Kruk, “As Amy Baker writes, parents who try to alienate their child from the other parent subtlely or overtly convey a three-part message to the child: I am the only parent who loves you and you need me to feel good about yourself; the other parent is dangerous and unavailable; and pursuing a relationship with the other parent jeopardizes your relationship with me.”

Judge Lisa O. Gorcya, 7/2015 Any lawyer, judge, mental health professional, or case worker who has ANY involvement in the family court is aware that one of the most devastating issues we face is that of Parental Alienation” …. and speaking to an alienated child “I’ve never seen anything like this. One day you can watch this video and realize that you two have been brainwashed. Your dad is a good man. Your dad is a good man who loves you. You have been brainwashed. This is not normal behavior. Only—no adult in this courtroom, except one, thinks this is normal. Every single adult in this courtroom thinks you have been brainwashed. Your dad is a good man. And wipe that smirk off your face.”

Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lerhmann, chair of the American Bar Association’s family law section, said in Oct 2010 ….  “Anyone who’s in this business knows there are situations where that [parental alienation] in fact is happening … ” she said.

“Over Loving” a Child 7/2015 To try to explain parental alienation and why an alienator would harm a child, some have proposed an analogy of “over loving” a child. It would be like the alienator hugging a child too hard and harming them ([Ryan Thomas]). To extend the over love metaphor, it would be for the alienator to love a child so much that they failed to recognize that the child was a separate person, with separate needs to connect with their other parent.  To “over love” them would be to hyper protect them from every nuance of every minor, exaggerated, and mostly imagined slight. These imagined slights include the alienator’s own weaknesses, projected over to the other parent. All rules of “fair play” are ignored by the alienator out of a belief that they are right so rules do not apply.

Workshop on Parental Alienation This is a 100 page slide deck from a workshop on parental alienation

Dr Childress explains that, in brief, under the pressures and self doubts caused by a divorce, a parent with unresolved childhood family relationship trauma that left them acutely vulnerable to fears of inadequacy or abandonment can have these fears re-triggered by the divorce.

To survive their crushing emotions, the alienating parents uses 3 psychological defense mechanisms:
1.) delusion: the alienating parent creates a self delusion that the other parent is worthy of rejection and abandonment
2.) splitting: thinking their ex to be all bad
3.) projection: imagining that every personal negative feeling is a thing done by their ex.  For example, my feelings of abandonment are really my ex’s feelings of actually being abandoned.

They can say to themselves, “See, I am not the abandoned, unworthy parent.  My ex is”.

To support their self delusion, they manipulate their child to reject/abandon the other parent, thus triangulating them into the marital conflict. Once the child claims (false) victim hood status, most people and most therapists naively make the mistake of piling on against the rejected parent, therefore validating the delusion of the alienating parent, which spreads to the child

Said in another way, as excerpted from Foundations: “At its foundational core, parental alienation represents the reenactment of a false drama of abuse and victimization from the childhood of a narcissistic/borderline parent that is embedded in the internal working models of the “alienating” parent’s attachment networks.  This false drama of a the reenactment narrative is created by the the psychopathology of a narcissistic/borderline parent in response to the psychological stress of the divorce and the reactivation of attachment trauma networks as a consequence of the divorce experience. In truth, there is no victimized child, there is no abusive parent, and there is no protective parent.  It is a false drama, an echo of a childhood trauma from long ago”

Here is an important excerpt from pages 17-22 Of Dr Childress’ “An Attachment-Based Model of Parental Alienation”

Theoretical Overview

The psychological processes involved in attachment-based “parental alienation” are complex, but they become increasingly self-evident with familiarity.  The primary reason for the initial apparent complexity of the dynamics is that they involve the psychological expressions within family relationship patterns of a narcissistic/(borderline) personality structure that has its origins in early attachment trauma from the childhood of the parent which is influencing, and in fact driving, the patterns of relationship interactions currently being expressed within the family.  The inner psychological processes of the narcissistic/(borderline) mind are inherently complex and swirling, and linking these distorted personality processes into the functioning of the underlying attachment system adds another level of complexity.  However, the nature of the pathology is stable across cases of “parental alienation,” so that this consistency in the pathology provides ever increasing clarity of understanding from increasing familiarity for the concepts.

Fully understanding these seemingly complex psychological and family factors requires an integrated recognition of the psychological and interpersonal dynamics across three interrelated levels of clinical analysis, 1) the family systems level, 2) the personality disorder level, and 3) the attachment system level.  Each of these levels individually provides a coherent explanatory model for the dynamics being expressed in “parental alienation,” and yet each individual level is also an interconnected expression of the pathology contained at the other two levels of analysis as well, so that a complete recognition of the psychopathology being expressed as “parental alienation” requires a conceptual understanding of the process across all three distinctly different, yet interconnected, levels of analysis.

The family systems processes involve the family’s inability to successfully transition from an intact family structure that is united by the marital relationship to a separated family structure that is united by the continuing parental roles with the child.  The difficulty in the family’s ability to transition from an intact family structure to a separated family structure is manifesting in the child’s triangulation into the spousal conflict through the formation of a cross-generational coalition with one parent (the allied and supposedly favored parent) against the other parent (the targeted-rejected parent).  These principles are standard and established family systems constructs that are extensively discussed and described by preeminent family systems theorists, such as Salvador Minuchin and Jay Haley.

The problems occurring at the family systems level of analysis have their origin in the narcissistic/(borderline) personality dynamics of the allied and supposedly favored parent.  The personality pathology of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent is creating a distorted emotional and psychological response in this parent to the psychological stresses associated with the interpersonal rejection and perceived abandonment surrounding the divorce.  The inherent interpersonal rejection associated with divorce triggers specific psychological vulnerabilities for the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, who then responds in characteristic but pathological ways that adversely influence the child’s relationship with the other parent.

The characteristic psychopathology of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent draws the child into a role-reversal relationship with the parent in which the child is used by the narcissistic/(borderline) parent as an external “regulatory object” to help the narcissistic/(borderline) parent regulate three separate but interrelated sources of intense anxiety that were triggered by the divorce,

  • Narcissistic Anxiety: The threatened collapse of the parent’s narcissistic defenses against an experience of core-self inadequacy that is being activated by the interpersonal rejection associated with the divorce;
  • Borderline Anxiety: The triggering of severe abandonment fears as a result of the divorce and dissolution of the intact family structure;
  • Trauma Anxiety: The activation and re-experiencing of excessive anxiety embedded in attachment trauma networks from the childhood of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent that become active when the attachment system of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent activates in order to mediate the loss experience associated with the divorce.

At the core level of the psychological and family dynamics that are traditionally described as “parental alienation” is the attachment trauma of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent that is being triggered and then reenacted in current family relationships.  It is this childhood attachment trauma of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent that is responsible for creating the narcissistic and borderline pathology of this personality.  The childhood attachment trauma experienced by the narcissistic/(borderline) parent subsequently coalesced during this parent’s adolescence and young adulthood into the narcissistic and borderline personality structures that are driving the distorted relationship dynamics associated with the “parental alienation.”  The childhood attachment trauma (i.e., a disorganized attachment) creates the narcissistic and borderline personality structures that then distort the family’s transition from an intact family structure to a separated family structure.

At the foundational core for triggering this integrated psychological and interpersonal dynamic is the reactivation by the divorce of attachment trauma networks from the childhood of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent that are contained within the internal working models of this parent’s attachment system.  The representational schemas for this childhood attachment trauma are in the pattern of “victimized child”/“abusive parent”/“protective parent,” and it is this trauma pattern from the childhood of the “alienating” narcissistic/(borderline) parent that is being reenacted in the current family relationships.

The childhood trauma patterns for role-relationships contained within the internal working models of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent’s attachment system are being reenacted in current family relationships.  The current child is adopting the trauma reenactment role as the “victimized child.” The child’s role as the “victimized child” then imposes the reenactment role of the “abusive parent” onto the targeted parent, and the coveted role in the trauma reenactment narrative of the all-wonderful “protective parent” is being adopted and conspicuously displayed by the narcissistic/(borderline) parent to the “bystanders” in the trauma reenactment.  The “bystanders” in the trauma reenactment are represented by the various therapists, parenting coordinators, custody evaluators, attorneys, and judges.  Their role in the trauma reenactment is to endorse the “authenticity” of the reenactment narrative.  These “bystanders” also serve the function of providing the narcissistic/(borderline) parent with the “narcissistic supply” of social approval for the presentation by the narcissistic/(borderline) parent as being the idealized and all-wonderful “protective parent.”

At its foundational core, “parental alienation” represents the reenactment of a false drama of abuse and victimization from the childhood of a narcissistic/(borderline) parent that is embedded in the internal working models of the “alienating” parent’s attachment networks.  This false drama of the reenactment narrative is created by the psychopathology of a narcissistic/(borderline) parent in response to the psychological stresses of the divorce and the reactivation of attachment trauma networks as a consequence of the divorce experience.  In actual truth, there is no victimized child, there is no abusive parent, and there is no protective parent.  It is a false drama, an echo of a childhood trauma from long ago, brought into the present by the pathological consequences of the childhood trauma in creating the distorting narcissistic/(borderline) personality structures of the alienating parent.

The child, for his or her part, is caught within this reenactment narrative by the distorting psychopathology and invalidating communications of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent that nullify the child’s own authentic self-experience in favor of the child becoming a narcissistic reflection for the parent.  Under the distorting pathogenic influence of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, the child is led into misinterpreting the child’s authentic grief and sadness at the loss of the intact family, and later at the loss of an affectionately bonded relationship with the targeted parent, as representing something “bad” that the targeted parent must be doing to create the child’s hurt (i.e., the child’s grief and sadness).  The (influenced) misinterpretation by the child for an authentic experience of grief and loss is then further inflamed by distorted communications from the narcissistic/(borderline) that transform the child’s authentic sadness into an experience of anger and resentment toward the targeted parent who (supposedly) caused the divorce and who (supposedly) is causing the child’s continuing emotional pain (i.e., the child’s misunderstood and misinterpreted feelings of grief and sadness).

Through a process of distorted parental communications by the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, the child is led into adopting the “victimized child” role within the trauma reenactment narrative.  Once the child adopts the “victimized child” role within the trauma reenactment narrative, this “victimized child” role automatically imposes upon the targeted parent the role as the “abusive parent,” and then the combined role definitions of the “abusive parent” and “victimized child” that are created the moment the child adopts the “victimized child” role allows the narcissistic/(borderline) parent to adopt the coveted trauma reenactment role as the all-wonderful nurturing and “protective parent,” which will then be so conspicuously displayed to the “bystanders” for their validation and “narcissistic supply.”

The description of an attachment-based model for the construct of “parental alienation” will uncover the layers of pathology, beginning with the surface level of the family systems dynamics involving the family’s difficulty in making the transition from an intact family structure to a separated family structure.  The description will then move into the personality disorder level to describe how the pathological characteristics of the narcissistic/(borderline) personality structures become expressed in the family relationship dynamics, particularly surrounding the formation of the role-reversal relationship of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent with the child in which the child is used (exploited) as a “regulatory other” for the psychopathology and anxiety regulation of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent.  Finally, the origins of the “parental alienation” process in the attachment trauma networks of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent will be examined, with a particular focus on the induced suppression of the child’s attachment bonding motivations and the formation and expression of the trauma reenactment narrative.

Following this discussion of the theoretical foundations for an attachment-based model of “parental alienation,” a broad overview of the diagnostic considerations emanating from an attachment-based model of “parental alienation” will be discussed, and three definitive diagnostic indicators for identifying attachment-based “parental alienation” will be described.  A descriptive framework for a model of “reunification therapy” will also be presented which will be based on the theoretical underpinnings for an attachment-based model of the “parental alienation.”  Finally, a discussion of the domains of knowledge necessary for professional competence in diagnosing and treating this special population of children and families will be identified.

News Release about Dr. Childress
NEWS RELEASE, FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 8/24/2015
For more information contact:
Howie Dennison, Advocate for Children
Central Ohio Parental Alienation
howie.dennison@gmail.com

Breakthrough in Fighting Child Abuse

8/24/2015, Columbus, OH – Dr. Craig Childress of Pasadena, CA, has made a scientific breakthrough that will help countless children worldwide who have been subjected to psychologically distorted parenting, according to Howie Dennison, an advocate for children at the Central Ohio Parental Alienation.  Dr. Childress’ theoretical model explains what happens to these children and how to help them.

Dr. Childress, a clinical psychologist, explained to Howie Dennison that, in simplified terms, some parents are so afraid to face their buried fears of being unlovable and unwanted, that when they face significant rejection during a divorce or breakup, they retreat into a fantasy world. In that fantasy world, they imagine that their ex partner is the unlovable and unwanted person, an abusive parent, and a fundamentally bad person. To build their fantasy, they coerce their children to reject their other parent by bringing them into the adult relational conflict through triangulation. To complete their fantasy, they then assume the coveted role of being an “all wonderful” parent who is ostensibly trying to protect their children from their “abusive” former partner. The “wonderful” parent then uses their children to satisfy their own emotional needs.
Dr. Childress has made it easy for professionals to identify when a child is a victim of this type of psychological abuse, because the child will show a unique behavior pattern: 1.) a rather sudden, unwarranted lack of attachment (feelings of love and affection) for the “rejected” parent 2.) feelings of being superior to the “rejected” parent which appear as arrogance, entitlement, a lack of empathy, and splitting (black and white thinking that one parent is all bad and the other parent is all good)  3.) a fixed but false belief that the “rejected” parent is inadequate.

In the language of standard psychology, a parent suffering from a narcissistic or borderline personality disorder can, under unrelenting stress or pressure, decompensate into a persecutory delusional state. These parents then expel their feelings of inadequacy or abandonment onto their former partner by using the defense mechanisms of projection and splitting. Through triangulation, psychological enmeshment with their children, and the formation of a cross generational alliance with their children, they influence their children to share their delusion. These parents then use their children as a narcissistic supply (or regulatory-other), creating a role reversal relationship that shows a lack empathy for their children’s own developmental needs.
Dr. Childress calls this pathogenic parenting or an attachment model of “parental alienation.” His theoretical formulation avoids controversy because it uses only accepted psychology about attachment, family systems, and personality disorders.

This fundamental advance in understanding will help abused children worldwide.

The overwhelming certainty of parental alienation
According to an APA Peer Reviewed Journal:       In a 2010 survey of professionals, 98% of the 300 respondents agreed with the question, “Do you think some children are manipulated by one parent to irrationally and unjustifiable reject the other parent?

To Do Nothing is to participate in the continued abuse of children
“Dr. Baker defined an “alienated child” as one who unjustifiably rejects one parent (the ‘disfavoured parent’) and is aligned with the other parent (the ‘favoured parent’),” Blok wrote. “This is distinct from the “realistic estrangement” of a child, who has rejected a parent but has done so for an objectively good reason.” In her report, Baker described parental alienation as “a form of emotional abuse. To do nothing is to participate in the continued abuse of children.”

Here is how one psychiatrist described it, without jargon: “False accusations of hostility, divisiveness and hatred occur not infrequently in marriages with high levels of conflict and with impending separation or divorce. When of an extremely severe nature, such anger can lead to demonizing a spouse in an effort to undermine the trust of the children in that spouse and to obtain their loyalty instead. This pathological behavior is referred to as parental alienation and is clearly psychologically damaging to Catholic youth, spouses and families. Spouses who make false accusations against a husband or wife frequently have serious lifelong psychological conflicts often with excessive anger, a compulsive need to control and intense selfishness with an inflated sense of self. The goal of the accusations is primarily to control the spouse and children, as well as to gain custody of the children through divorce litigation. The origins of these actions are often from unconsciously modeling their presence in a parent or from giving into the pull of selfishness in the culture.”
Greatest Victories in the Fight Against Parental Alienation

Six Peer Reviewed Studies Show that Parental Alienation is Child Abuse

See also related topics: APA affirms that parental alienation is child abuse and DSM-5 diagnostic code V995.51
 

A Critical Review of Research Literature

Educational Awareness Advocates at pas-intervention.com
Overview 

In surveys of adults, the same people who answered questions about whether they were psychologically abused as child also had a strong tendency to say that a parent used one or more of the 17 methods of parental alienation. This is a fully empirical approach … the definition of parental alienation is empirical, based on methods formerly alienated children say a parent used to alienate them.

Introduction

An integrative literature review was done of studies that examined the relationship between Parental Alienation (PA) and Child Psychological Maltreatment by analyzing correlations between two survey block responses:

  1. Parental Alienation, defined as a parent engaging in any of 19 specific behaviors, measured by the Baker Strategy Scale (BSQ)
  2. Child Psychological maltreatment, defined by The American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC) as 5 parental behaviors, measured by the PMM Questionnaire

Acknowledgement
We are indebted to Dr Baker, whose analysis we have followed closely. [Baker 2014] 

Definition of Parental Alienation

An Objective measure: 19 behaviors of a parent.   This definition strategy eliminates all controversy:

  1. Made negative comments
  2. Limited contact
  3. Confided in child
  4. Encouraged reliance on [alienating] parent
  5. Required favoritism of child
  6. Asked child to keep secrets
  7. Made child choose between parents
  8. Hard to be with extended family of other parent
  9. Encouraged disregard for other parent
  10. Upset at child’s affection with other parent
  11. Discomfort at other parent
  12. Fostered anger/hurt at other parent
  13. Said other parent was unsafe
  14. Tried to turn against other parent
  15. Said other parent was unloving
  16. Asked child to spy
  17. Called other parent by first name
  18. Withheld or blocked messages from other parent Referred to new spouse as Mom/Dad

Definition of Psychological Maltreatment

Consensus definition from APSAC as 5 parental behaviors of a parent, measured by the PMM and CAPM-CV scales:

  1. Spurning (In parental alienation, parent withdraws love from child to punish when connecting to other parent)
  2. Terrorizing (In PA, inducing fear of other parent)
  3. Isolating (In PA, child is cut off from other parent)
  4. Corrupting/Exploiting (In PA, child engages in behaviors that are cruel, disrespectful, and immoral)
  5. Denying Emotional Responsiveness (In PA, child is punished for connecting to other parent)

Further Independent Confirmation
Other studies show that the children who fare the worst in divorce are those that become involved with it.   This provides independent confirmation that the 6 studies to the left are on the right track [Baker 2014] :

  1. There are studies that show general negative effects on children’s emotional well-being due to their involvement in their parent’s divorce [Emery 2006]
  2. It is not the dissolution of the marriage per se that is associated with the more lasting negative effects but rather interpersonal conflicts between parents [Buehler et al 1998]
  3. Children who are involved with their parent’s post divorce struggles can suffer from intense feelings of stress and divided loyalties. [Amato & Afifi 2006]
The Impact of Child Psychological Abuse

“Childhood psychological abuse is as harmful as sexual or physical abuse.   Often unrecognized, emotional abuse is a prevalent form of child abuse.” [American Psychological Association 2014] [Spinazzola 2014]

Psychological Symptoms of Parental Alienation

Exposure to the 19 parental behaviors can result in these psychological symptoms [Childress 2014]:

  1. Suppression of the normal range functioning of the child’s attachment system relative to one parent, involving a child initiated “cutoff” of their relationship with a parent
  2. The presence in the child’s symptom display of a specific  set of narcissistic and borderline personality disorder features, such as splitting: one parent is all good, one parent is all bad.
  3. An intransigently held fixed and false believe system about the fundamental inadequacy of the rejected parent

Policy Implications

  1. Mental Health Professionals should be trained to recognize exposure to parental alienation as per the 19 parental behaviors and the psychological symptoms described above
  2. Parental Alienation is a child protection issue
  3. Alienated children, including adult children of alienated children, are a special population, and those who work with them require advanced training in family systems, personality disorders, and attachment systems [Childress 2014]4.It is common for those without intensive training to mis-understand, unwittingly side with the alienator, and bring further harm to children [Miller 2013]

Areas Where Research Could be Improved

  1. More studies are needed in other countries, with international collaboration and sharing of standard data
  2. Parental alienation should be studied for each parent, to show the “protection” given to the child is not justified

Conclusions

Parental alienation constitutes child psychological maltreatment.  “In six independent studies in which PA was measured with a reliable and valid scale (BSQ) and PM was measured using a reliable and valid scale (PMM or CAPM-CV), parental alienation was consistently found to be associated with PM with both a strong degree of statistical significance and moderate effect sizes.”

References

[Amato & Afifi 2006]  Amato, P. R. & Afifi, T, D., (2006).  Feeling caught between parents .  Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 222-235, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00243.x

[American Psychological Association 2014] Press Release, October  2014

[Baker 2010] Baker, A. J. L. (2010).  Adult recall of parental alienation in a community sample: Prevalence and associations with psychological maltreatment.   Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 51, 1-20, doi:10.1080/10502550903423206

[Baker2014] Amy J L Baker Ph.D., “Parental Alienation as a form of psychological maltreatment: Review of Theory and Research”, Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, Vol. 16, n. 1, marzo 2014, p. 37-55

[Baker & Ben Ami]  Baker, A. J. L., & Ben Ami, N. (2011) To Turn a Child Against a Parent is to Turn a Child Against Himself .  Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 52, 7, 472-489 doi 10.1080/10502556.2011.609424

[Baker & Brassard 2013]  Baker, A. J. L., & Brassard, M. R. (2013) Adolescents caught in parental loyalty conflicts.   Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 54, 5, 393-413, doi: 10.1080/10502556.2013.800398

[Baker & Eichler 2014] Baker, A. J. L., & Eichler, A. “College student exposure to parental loyalty conflicts”, Families in Society, 2014, Volume 95, No. 1, p. 59-66

[Baker & Verroccio 2013] Baker, A. J. L., & Verroccio, M. C. “Italian College Student-reported exposure to parental alienation: Correlates with well-being.”  Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 54, 8, 609-628, doi:10.1080/105025556.2013.7377.14

[Buehler et al 1998] Buehler, C. (1998).  Interparental conflict styles and youth problem behaviors.  Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 119-132

[Childress 2014] Childress, Craig, PsyD, Parental Alienation: An Attachment Based Model, Master Lecture Series, California Southern  University

[Emery 2006]  Emery, R. E., Interparental conflict and the children of discord and divorce.  Psychological Bulletin, 92, 2, 310-330, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.310

[Miller 2013] Miller, Steven, PhD, Harvard University Medical School Staff, “Working with Alienated Children and Families: A Clinical Guidebook”, Chapter 2

[Spinazzola 2014]  Spinazzola, Joseph, In Press, APA Journal: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, Policy

[Verroccio & Baker 2013] Verroccio, M. C., & Baker,  A. J. L. (2013) “Italian adult’s recall of childhood exposure to parental loyalty conflicts”  Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1-11,doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9816-0

Simple Tools for AB-PA Assessment

“How do we get a standard of practice?”

Dr. C: We don’t get one. We build a standard of practice piece by piece, and we start with a – semi-structured and flexibly standardized intake assessment protocol for attachment-related pathology surrounding divorce.

“That’s a lot of words. Is there a shorter way to say that?”

Dr. C: We start with the AB-PA assessment protocol.

“Okay, that’s shorter. But what is an AB-PA assessment protocol?”

Dr. C: It’s a structured assessment protocol for pathogenic parenting.

“What’s pathogenic parenting?”

Dr. C: It’s bad parenting, so bad that it’s creating psychological pathology in the child.

“What does the AB-PA assessment protocol consist of?”

Dr. C: Two scales to document the data from the assessment.

The Parenting Practices Rating Scale to document potential pathogenic parenting by the targeted-rejected parent.
http://www.drcachildress.org/asp/admin/getFile.asp…

The Diagnostic Checklist for Pathogenic Parenting to document potential pathogenic parenting by an allied narcissistic/borderline parent.
http://www.drcachildress.org/asp/admin/getFile.asp…

“How does that help?”

Dr. C: Once we have the information – the data – documented, then we can make better decisions based on information and data, rather than mere guesswork.

“Is there anything else you’d recommend, to help with data-driven decision-making?”

Dr. C: For all families in therapy, the targeted parent and child, I’d recommend that they start collecting daily ratings on the Parent-Child Relationship Rating Scale when the child is in the care of the targeted parent, and then to bring these ratings to the weekly family therapy session for discussion with the therapist.

Parent-Child Relationship Rating Scale
http://www.drcachildress.org/asp/admin/getFile.asp…

“Why is that helpful?”

Dr. C: Again, it improves our decision making, it’s called “evidence-based practice.” That means that decisions are based on evidence – on data. The Diagnostic Checklist, the Parenting Rating Scale, and the Parent-Child Relationship Scale all collect relevant data for improved decision-making.

DRCACHILDRESS.ORG

The Alienated Parent Experiences Complex Trauma. But the Child(ren) Fare Far Worse. They experience Trauma AND a Pathology They Don’t Deserve!

20245592_1079754712161010_8175834698057134348_n

20374305_1097913300345151_7904770224775124336_n

Musings by Tom:  I recognize that I have experienced grief due to the pathogenic parenting of my ex.   Understanding the source of the pathology caused me to go from anger and horror to sympathy for the poor, disgusting and sad woman.  She is sick, as is her family of origin.  I realized that insisting on being in my children’s lives caused them great harm since putting any pressure on ‘that system’ raised anxiety levels meteorically and ended up badly for everyone because of the insecurities and trauma reenactment of the ex.  So in 2014, after reading Foundations and connecting with Dr. Craig Childress, PsyD, I went ‘hands off’ with my children to spare them the abuse.  Shortly afterward I started this blog.  I began study the development of AB-PA and the old Gardnerian PAS to understand this very destructive disease.  I have my own DSM IV.  I probably have more working knowledge in this area than 99+% of clinical psychologists.  My youngest of five has now graduated high school.  She and the oldest (the scapegoat) are safely out of the diseased environment.  The middle three are still trapped in Hell, at their mother’s mansion, suffering depression and having their relationships destroyed on a regular basis.  I have been dragged through court for the past 10 years (August 2007) at the expense of close to $200,000 payed for by the ex mother-in-law, the enabler-in-chief.  I spent $5,000 and when the attorney said the money was gone after three meetings, I agreed with her.  The latest motion before the court (August 2017) was to have me held ‘in contempt.’  What a joke.   I went no-contact years ago because I could not tolerate the pathological lying of the pathological liar.  Everything the ex says is either an outright lie or a half-truth.   I still have great hope.  My kids know what I stand for and what I represent to them.  They haven’t lost me, they only think they have and as Dr. Childress and Darcy Pruter both say, ‘they need to regain empathy in order to be made healthy.’  Of course, they need to become independent of the ‘regime’ and begin to individuate and pursue their own personal interests, not continue being brainwashed to think, act and feel like a sickly woman with an incurable pathology.

Complex Trauma: Traumatic Grief

To be the targeted parent of “parental alienation” (AB-PA) is traumatic.  The type of trauma is called “Complex Trauma,” and the form of complex trauma is called “traumatic grief.”

To the targeted parents, I am a clinical psychologist.  What you are experiencing is a form of Complex Trauma called “traumatic grief.”

Wikipedia:  Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

When I meet with targeted parents for consultations, I often end the consultation by providing encouragement to the targeted parent to find areas for self-nurture to address their complex trauma and traumatic grief.  The analogy I use is that if your child is in quicksand, it doesn’t help for you to jump into the quicksand after them, because then you’re both in trouble.  The targeted parent needs to stand on the solid ground of your own emotional and psychological health and to throw your child a rope that your child can use to pull himself or herself out.

Will your child grab the rope?  Probably not.  Your child has to live with the pathology of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent.  Your child has to do what they have to do to survive in that upside-down and psychologically dangerous world of their narcissistic/(borderline) parent.  Until we are able to first protect the child, we cannot ask the child to reveal their authenticity.  We must first protect the child.

It doesn’t help if you jump in the quicksand too.  Your psychological trauma is real.  It’s a form of complex trauma called “traumatic grief.”  It is a central feature of the pathogen that is creating the attachment-related pathology of “parental alienation” (AB-PA).  I’ve read the “source code” of the pathology, the information structures of the attachment system that create the pathology, and the complex trauma of traumatic grief is embedded in the source code of the pathogen.

One of the core guiding features of the information structures that create this pathology is the creation of traumatic grief in the targeted-rejected parent.  That’s what the information structures of this pathogenic agent in the attachment system are designed to do, they create the complex trauma of traumatic grief in the targeted parent.  Let me explain.

In the Wikipedia article I cite above, notice the linkage of Complex Trauma to both attachment-related pathology (disorganized attachment) and borderline personality pathology.

The childhood origins of attachment-based “parental alienation” (AB-PA) are in the disorganized attachment – the attachment trauma – of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent (“disorganized attachment” is a defined and researched category of “insecure attachment”; see for example, Main & Hesse, 1990; Lyons-Ruth, Bronfman, & Parsons, 1999).

And disorganized attachment in childhood is at the core of the later development of borderline personality pathology:

“Various studies have found that patients with BPD are characterized by disorganized attachment representations (Fonagy et al., 1996; Patrick et al, 1994).  Such attachment representations appear to be typical for persons with unresolved childhood traumas, especially when parental figures were involved, with direct, frightening behavior by the parent.  Disorganized attachment is considered to result from an unresolvable situation for the child when ‘the parent is at the same time the source of fright as well as the potential haven of safety’ (van IJzendoorn, Schuengel, & Bakermans-Kranburg, 1999, p. 226).” (Beck, et al, 2004, p. 191)

Notice that I always link the narcissistic and borderline personality of the allied pathogenic parent in AB-PA using the term “narcissistic/(borderline)” parent, embedding the term “(borderline)” in parenthesis.  This is to make the point that the narcissistic personality has a borderline core.  These personality pathology styles are simply differing outward manifestations of an identical underlying core attachment pathology.

“One subgroup of borderline patients, namely, the narcissistic personalities… seem to have a defensive organization similar to borderline conditions, and yet many of them function on a much better psychosocial level.” (Kernberg, 1975, p. xiii)

“Most of these patients [i.e., narcissistic] present an underlying borderline personality organization.” (Kernberg, 1975, p. 16)

Kernberg, O.F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism.. New York: Aronson.

There is a diagram of the attachment-related pathology of AB-PA on my website:

Diagram of AB-PA Pathology

Work your way from the bottom of this diagram to the top along two separate but interrelated lines.  The inside description is the personality disorder line of disordered mourning and the pathological processing of sadness and grief, the outside lines are the attachment related lines, that leads to the trauma reenactment narrative.

Now look again to the description of Complex Trauma in Wikipedia.  Notice the association of Complex Trauma with both disorganized attachment and borderline personality pathology (narcissistic personality pathology is less studied in the research literature because the narcissistic personality rarely if ever presents for therapy).

The childhood disorganized attachment of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent constellated during the adolescent and early adulthood developmental periods into the personality pathology of the narcissistic-borderline parent that drives the current “parental alienation” process (AB-PA).

Whether the manifestation of the underlying attachment trauma assumes a more narcissistic-style or borderline-style of expression depends on how the narcissistic/(borderline) parent-as-a-child responded to and coped with the childhood attachment trauma.  A disorganized attachment with avoidant overtones leads to a more narcissistic style of personality presentation in which loving attachment relationships are devalued.  A disorganized attachment with strongly anxious-ambivalent overtones in which a child tries to maintain an attachment bond to a frightening and dangerous parent (Beck et al., 2004), leads to a more borderline-style presentation of chaotic and hyper-expressive mood swings (called “protest behavior”) and continual fears of abandonment.

At the core of both personalities is a profound inner emptiness – a vacancy of being. The borderline style personality experiences this profound emptiness nearly all the time, and much of the relationship effort by a borderline-style personality is designed to fill the core emptiness of their being. The borderline-style personalty engages in frantic efforts to continually remain the center of attention, seeking constant reassurances of being loved.  Any real or imagined slights that suggest that the borderline personality might not be loved result in excessively angry displays of vitriol and victimization directed toward the failing attachment figure.

Think of the borderline-style personalty as emerging from a child who is trying to form an attachment bond to an unstable frightening and dangerous parent, yet a parent who is nevertheless also a source of nurture.  Even when an attachment bond can be formed, it is fragile and the child is exceedingly anxious and hyper-vigilant for signs of abandonment that can signal the emergence of the frightening, dangerous, and rejecting parental attachment figure.

The narcissistic personality, on the other hand, results from a child who chooses a different approach to coping with a frightening-rejecting parent.  In the formation of the narcissistic-style personality, the child chooses safety over intimacy. The child dismisses the importance of forming an attachment bond to the frightening-rejecting parent (called an “avoidant” attachment style).  The narcissistic-style personality sacrifices intimacy for safety.

But sacrificing intimacy with the attachment figure of the parent creates a core emptiness in the self-experience of the child.  The psychological intimacy with our parents that the rest of us experienced as children established in us a core inner sense of our healthy narcissism; that we are fundamentally valued and valuable people.  This didn’t occur in the childhood of the narcissistic personality.  In avoiding intimacy with the dangerous-rejecting attachment figure, the core sense of self as being valued and valuable did not get established.  Instead an artificial pathological narcissism developed of fragile over-inflated self-grandiosity and self-importance that is not rooted in an authentic belief in one’s true core value.

Just like with the borderline personality, at the core of the narcissistic personality is a fundamental inner emptiness of being.  The difference is that by adopting a narcissistic defense of grandiose self-importance in which other people, and intimate relationships with other people, are devalued, the narcissistic personality is able to develop a slightly greater stability in functioning – as long as the person can maintain the narcissistic veneer of self-value.

However, if the narcissistic defense is penetrated by criticism or rejection – especially by rejection – which exposes the core self-inadequacy of the narcissistic personalty (called a “narcissistic injury”), then the narcissistic personality will collapse into it’s borderline core of profound inner emptiness.  When rejected, the narcissistic personality responds with rageful and demeaning attacks on the other person (called “narcissistic rage”) in order to reestablish the narcissistic defense of grandiose self-importance by devaluing the importance of the other person (“I’m not the inadequate person; YOU are.”)

AB-PA and Complex Trauma

The origin of the attachment-based pathology of “parental alienation” (AB-PA) is to be found in the childhood attachment trauma of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, who is then transferring this childhood trauma into the current family relationships, a process mediated by the personality disorder pathology of this parent that is itself a product of this parent’s childhood attachment trauma.

In the pathology of “parental alienation” (AB-PA), the complex developmental trauma from the childhood of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, that has become frozen into the pathological personality structure of this parent, is being transmitted to you, the targeted-rejected parent, in the form of “traumatic grief.”  You, the targeted-rejected parent, are being made to hold the complex trauma that was the childhood experience of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent.

At the core of this complex trauma is the pathological processing of sadness, grief, and loss of the attachment figure:

  • The parent in the childhood of the current narcissistic/(borderline) parent;
  • The spousal attachment figure in the divorce;
  • The beloved child of the targeted parent in “parental alienation.”

The organizing central theme of “parental alienation” (AB-PA) is pathological mourning.  The pathological processing of sadness, grief, and loss.

I’ve read the “source code” of this pathogen (I’ve read the content and process of its information structures).  I know what it is and I know how functions.  Once we’ve solved this pathology and bring this family nightmare to an end, I’ll begin to unpack the deeper levels of this pathology for my professional colleagues.  But for now, let me simply identify what is occurring for you, the parent who is being targeted for rejection by this severe and horrific form of trans-generational attachment pathology.

The overall attachment-related pathology is called “pathological mourning” (Bowlby, 1980).

“The deactivation of attachment behavior is a key feature of certain common variants of pathological mourning.” (Bowlby, 1980, p. 70)

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and Depression. NY: Basic Books.

You, the targeted parent are being locked into a FALSE trauma reenactment narrative of “abusive parent”/”victimized child”/”protective parent.”

In locking you into this FALSE trauma reenactment narrative of the complex trauma from the childhood of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, you are being made to hold the complex trauma – you have become the repository, the receptacle, holding the complex trauma.  The complex trauma from the childhood of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent is being created in you.  The form of the complex trauma is called, “traumatic grief.”

The core of the “parental alienation” pathology is the disordered processing of sadness, grief, and loss.  The primary case of the “pathological mourning” is the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, who is translating feeling of sadness and “mournful longing” surrounding the divorce into “anger and resentment, loaded with resentful wishes”:

“They [narcissists] are especially deficient in genuine feelings of sadness and mournful longing; their incapacity for experiencing depressive reactions is a basic feature of their personalities.  When abandoned or disappointed by other people they may show what on the surface looks like depression, but which on further examination emerges as anger and resentment, loaded with revengeful wishes, rather than real sadness for the loss of a person whom they appreciated.” (Kernberg, 1975,p. 229)

Kernberg, O.F. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Aronson.

The pathogenic parenting practices of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent are then transferring this parent’s own disordered mourning onto the child, creating the pathology of the child’s rejection of a normal-range and affectionally available parent.

Through the child’s rejection of a loving and beloved parent, the targeted parent is made to hold the complex trauma at the core of the pathology in the form of traumatic grief surrounding the loss of their beloved child.

All targeted parents have been psychologically brutalized by the complex trauma of traumatic grief.  In surviving this trauma until the time when we obtain professional competence from professional psychology, you need to take a lot of active steps to process and metabolize the trauma.

You are not a bad parent.  You’re a good parent.  I know this.  You know this.  It is a FALSE trauma reenactment narrative being created surrounding you.

Take care of yourself physically to process the trauma.  Trauma becomes embedded in our physical structures.  Exercise.  Eat well and healthy.

It’s okay to be happy.  The traumatic grief can be consuming, and you might feel guilty if you actually achieve moments and times of happiness.  It’s okay for you to be happy.  You love your children.  Your grief is real.  So is your happiness with a new spouse or in activities you enjoy.  You need to find happiness and enjoyment in order to process the traumatic grief.  It’s okay to be happy.

If you find yourself obsessing about the trauma you’re experiencing, journal about it.  Get it out of you and onto paper.  I’ll have more to say later about the potential role of journaling in processing your trauma.

Know this, you are not alone.  There are others who are going through the same thing and who understand.  I understand.  We are working to solve this and to bring your authentic and beautiful children back to you.  You are not alone.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857

Beck, A.T., Freeman, A., Davis, D.D., & Associates (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. (2nd edition). New York: Guilford.

Lyons-Ruth, K., Bronfman, E. & Parsons, E. (1999). Maternal frightened, frightening, or atypical behavior and disorganized infant attachment patterns. In J. Vondra & D. Barnett (Eds.) Atypical patterns of infant attachment: Theory, research, and current directions. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, (3, Serial No. 258).

Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E.M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 161–182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

AB-PA: Attachment Based Parental Alienation, Dr. Craig Childress

An Attachment Model of Parental Alienation

Context: Dr Craig Childress introduced a vastly improved model of parental alienation in 2014, based on attachment theory. It is more accurately called “pathogenic parenting”.  It operates at a deeper psychological level and replaces (or possibly complements) the Gardner Model from the 1980s. It shows that severe parental alienation is simply a manifestation of standard and established forms of pathologies.  The attachment model’s explanatory power and precision are remarkable, and it offers insights for identifying children and treating who have been emotionally abused. The model specifies a set of three psychologicasymptoms (more conveniently described in checklist format) and provides psychological explanation for how bad parenting causes these symptoms and why a parent would use bad parenting. It is a theoretical formulation. No one else has provided an alternative explanation for how a child could end up with these symptoms. No one has pointed to a specific case where a child had these symptoms but they were caused by something else.

Significance: All licensed mental health professionals are obligated to understand it by virtue of their state licensing (boundaries of competence) it is a game changer. The valid underlying clinical construct can no longer be ignored or dismissed.

Summary of the Attachment Model: In brief the attachment model is the intersection of three layers: family systems, personality disorder, and the attachment system. The narcissistic/(borderline) parent psychologically decompensates into persecutory delusional beliefs because of activation of excessive anxiety surrounding the perceived interpersonal rejection and perceived abandonment and inadequacy associated with the divorce. The child is triangulated into the conflict. The induced disruption of the child’s attachment system produces a  characteristic set of  three  child symptom  features, listed below. These precise clinical indicators form a unique signature, differentiated form other forms of child abuse. These are severe cases where a parent with borderline personality disorder to narcissistic personality disorder has decompensated into persecutory delusions that the other parent is abusive. A longer summary is also available.


The Book
:
 Dr Childress describes his model in his book 
An Attachment-Based Model of Parental Alienation: Foundations. You can read the  overview from pages 17-22, the first chapter, or a  News Release .  See also the Childress Institute.

Differential Diagnosis of Pathogenic ParentingDr. Childress explains the differential diagnosis procedure.
Uses Only Accepted Psychology: The attachment model relies only on universally accepted, standard, scientific psychological principles and constructs, documented in approximately 60 standard works of professional psychology. It uses list of standard pathologies. It simply  connects the dots in DSM-5, and in doing so, sidesteps all controversy. Every mental health provider is, in essence, already trained in it. There is nothing new. Mental health providers, by virtue of their licensing, are required to understand it (boundaries of competence).  By contrast, the Gardner model uses “new” behavioral indicators such as “presence of borrowed scenarios” and the “independent thinker phenomenon”. The Gardner model indicators appear no where in standard psychology

See also Dr. Childress’ presentation at the Annual National AFCC conference in Boston in June 2017Overview1,  Overview2, and slide deck parts ab, and c

Dr. Childress’ Video Lecture  at California Southern University in 2014 and  associated slide deck:

1. Slide Deck for both talks (in pdf format) 95 slides for the two lectures above, in a pdf file. Other than the book, this slide deck is the fastest way to learn about the attachment model of parental alienation. Listen to the talk for more details.
2. Theoretical Foundations for an Attachment-based model of “Parental Alienation” A two hour talk on July 28th, 2014 with convenient written transcript
3. Diagnosis and Treatment of Attachment Based “Parental Alienation”  A two hour talk on November 21, 2014  with convenient written transcript

Dr. Childress’ Slide Decks from PASYMPOSIUM2017: Morning Keynote and Afternoon Part 2

See also  observations from the American Psychiatric Association on tendencies of parents with borderline or narcissistic personality disorder.

For answers to common misunderstandings and complaints about pathogenic parenting, see the frequently asked questions.

Three Diagnostic Child symptom features :
1)  a  prominent  suppression  of the  normal range  functioning  of  the   child’s  attachment  bonding  motivations  toward one  parent,  the  targeted rejected  parent,   with  a  corresponding  hyper bonding  motivation  expressed  by  the child  toward  the allied   and  favored  parent
2)  the  prominent display in  the  child’s  symptom   presentation of  a  specific set  of  narcissistic  and  borderline  personality  disorder  features: grandiosity (judgement of parent), entitlement (child feels justified in inflicting a retaliatory retribution on the targeted-rejected parent for the supposed parental failure), arrogance (contempt for inadequate parent), and absence of empathy (for the rejected parent) 
3)  an  intransigently  held, fixed  and  false  belief  of  the  child  regarding the  fundamental  parental inadequacy,  and  often  personal  inadequacy,  of  the  targeted rejected  parent  which the child  characterizes  as a  form  of  emotional  or  psychological  child  abuse  by  the  targeted rejected  parent”.

In effect, parental alienation is the trans generational transmission of attachment trauma.

27 Training Videos on Parental Alienation Dynamics, from Sept 2014, each about 10 minutes long

Click the line above to get an index of the 27 videos.  Here are summaries or a transcript of three of the more interesting videos:

The Alienation Narrative – Video #10

Unofficial Transcription by Howie Dennison 2/23/2016: “This video discusses the child’s role in establishing the “Alienation Narrative” and the child’s role in creating that narrative in the service of narcissistically disorganized personality disorder of the alienating parent. I start by interviewing the targeted parent and begin to hear the family system process of triangulating the child into the marital conflict, allied with one parent, and possibly the enmeshed psychological relationship of that parent. At the very least, I am beginning to suspect the triangulation alliance feature, and I might also begin to hear the beginnings of that splitting dynamic that would be suggestive of a borderline personality disorder process within the family system. Then I interview the child, with an interest in differential diagnosis, and I begin to hear confirmation of the triangulated alliance and also beginning to get evidence of the enmeshed psychological relationship with the alienating parent. The child over idealizes that parent and is hateful toward the targeted parent and in that process of wonderful idealized parent and horrible hated parent and often times the child will use the word I hate that parent is the beginnings of that splitting dynamic. And so when the hear the potential of splitting of all good and all wonderful I am then beginning to look for a personality disorder and given the nature of this type of family dynamic I am looking for a narcissitically organized personality disorder with borderline features and potentially either, depending on how you conceptualize it, paranoid personality features or a persecutory delusional disorder. And so then I interview the allied parent and I get that narcissistic presentation I am all the wonderful parent and the other parent is inadequate and horrible and if I try to challenge that and say I see the child as being the problem the narcissistically organized parent just denies it and will avoid identifying the child as having any problem and the child presents no behavior problems at all. Let me discuss how all that functions within the necessary narrative for the narcissistically organized parent. At the seed core of narcissism is a fundamental sense of self inadequacy and the narcissistic self inflation is the defensive process against this tremendous sense of inadequacy. And what happens in this alienation dynamic because the child is in an enmeshed relationship with this parent the child expresses this narcissistically disorganized personality disorder through the narrative actions of the child and the child’s actions construct this narrative of the targeted parent as being inadequate and abusive and the alienating parent as being wonderful and a superlative parent. And so when the child rejects the targeted parent the child’s rejections defines the targeted parent as a bad parent. Why else would the child reject the parent if it wasn’t that the parent was so bad.  Now if the mental health clinician accepts this presentation they are colluding with the personality disorder and the alienation dynamic that is being created here. They are absolutely missing the relationship processes involved. That is what the child and the alienating parent want us to believe. They are creating the rejection in order to define the targeted parent as an inadequate abusive person. In addition, the child’s all wonderful behavior with the allied parent defines that parent as the all wonderful terrific parent great parent which serves the narcissistic inflation of that alienating parent’s narcissistically disorganized personality disorder. And so the child’s behavior is defining each of those parents within that splitting dynamic. And that definition of the parents services the narcissism of the alienating parent, that I am the all wonderful parent and that core sense of inadequacy is then projected onto the targeted parent where the alienating parent can then reject it in the guise of the targeted parent. Your the inadequate one, not me, I am the all wonderful one additional that borderline process of fear of abandonment is being expressed through the child’s rejection of the targeted parent. From the perspective of the narcissistically organized alienating parent, “I am not being rejected, I am being adored.  You are the one that is being abandoned, not me” And the fear of the narcissistically organized parent is that someone, somehow, somewhere will recognize that they are an inadequate person. They are bad. They are not OK. And once we recognize that we are going to leave them. And so they get this narcissistic inflation “I am all wonderful and the child is never going to leave me they adore me. I am the wonderful parent.  It is the other parent that is being abandoned.”  So again it is the projection of the abandonment fear or that inadequate fear onto the targeted parentIf as a clinician you miss this that is a serious, serious diagnostic failure on your part.  How can you possibly miss such a flamboyant display of a personality disorder? The only potential reason is that you don’t know what you’re doing. You should begin to recognize the structural family systems process of triangulation alienation and as you begin to explore that you should recognize the seeds of splitting and as you recognize the seeds of the splitting and begin to explore for a personality disorder you should be able to recognize the narcissistic organization and the borderline organization to the relationship parent and recognize this alienation narrative that the child’s behavior is defining.  And one of the key elements in recognizing this is looking at the authenticity of that child’s definition of the targeted parent ”

Interviewing the Child – Video #11

Unofficial Transcription Intro by Howie Dennison 2/23/2016:This video discusses diagnostic information collected during the child interview process.  (The child’s authenticity of rejecting the targeted parent.)  The child provokes the parent, and the child uses the parent’s response as justification for their anger.  “I hate my parent because they disciplined me when I verbally abused them.” The truth is that if you look at behavioral sequences, the child is not the victim of abuse, but the child is the perpetrator of the abuse.

Missed Persecutory Delusion – Video #17

Unofficial Transcription by Howie Dennison 2/23/2016: “Hello I’m doctor Craig Childress in the clinical psychologist in Pasadena California.  I work with children and families around issues of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, angry oppositional defiance disorder, parent-child relationship problems, marital problems things like that. In this video series up discussing a particular type of parent-child relationship problem that I refer to as a   parental alienation dynamic. In this  video segment what I’d like to discuss is clinical competence issues related to the diagnosis the axis1  diagnoses of the delusional disorder and a shared psychotic disorder.  Now the persecutory delusional disorder of the alienating parent and the shared psychotic disorder the child that shared through the enmeshed psychological relationship represent major axis one disorders in they fall under the category psychotic disorders. And that sounds pretty severe. That’s the same category that  other diagnoses such as schizophrenia fall under.  And it is, it’s a pretty significant in severe category of diagnoses. the issue becomes how did a clinician miss such a serious diagnosis.  And here’s my guess as to how that happened.  First,  child’s therapists are not particularly sensitized to working with the psychotic disorder. The psychotic disorders tend to show up as schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and they show up in late adolescence and involve major mental disabilities. And so there’s a different class of psychotherapists that work with that than the ones who work with child and parent-child relationship problems we see you in child therapy and we tend to see angry opposition kids, family problems, things like that, and we don’t tend to see psychotic disorders.  And so  there’s just not a lot of experience in child therapists working with psychotic disorders.  Now for my own personal background, I worked for 15 years on a major UCLA research project regarding  schizophrenia and we would track schizophrenic patients from their first  psychotic break for about three or four years and so it was a longitudinal project. And through my association with that project I was trained to clinical competence in a particular clinical interview scale called the brief psychiatric rating scale bprs and that rating scales was about 18 items as I recall that 18 symptoms such as depression, anxiety,  bizarre behavior, as well as the psychotic symptoms, unusual thought content, which is delusions, hallucinations and and conceptual disorganizations.  And it was a seven-point scale.  Anything rated 4 and above was considered psychotic on the psychotic scales.  Anything below 4 was considered sort of normal range, maybe unusual, but still in  range. and what we would do on that really scale is we will be making fine scaled discriminations such as on unusual thought content for delusions. The difference between a 4 and a 5.  4 is an encapsulated delusion that’s just barely over threshold, whereas a five is more of a bizarre delusion. Six  is okay, now we have significant delusional processes that are flooding all over the place. And seven  is pretty severe, generally for hallucinations or conceptual disorganizations. So were making fun scale  discriminations between 3 and a 4, 4 and a 5, 5 and a 6. So we were being trained to clinical competence in making these rating. So I’ve been sensitized what delusions look like at various scales. And this particular delusion, this persecutory delusion, I recognize, it’d be kind of tough to identify okay, because it’s not a bizarre delusion. It’s what’s called a non bizarre delusion. Is it possible this other parents is inadequate and abusive? Oh absolutely, that’s within the realm of possibility, so it’s a non-bizarre delusion.  The definition of a delusion is a fixed false  belief system that is non-responsive to contrary evidence, can’t change it, and it’s fixed and it’s false. and it doesn’t respond to the contrary evidence. That’s a delusion. In this case it’s an encapsulated solution, so it’s a non bizarre encapsulated delusion, where encapsulated means its targeted around a very specific area.  And when you get an encapsulated delusion, the person can look totally fine.  They can go to work, they can talk, then can look totally fine.  They can talk to people and socialize at a party and you’d never know the delusional.  But you get to that one specific area where they have the delusion and you go, oh my goodness that’s really unusual.  That’s called encapsulated delusion, and on the BPRS we would rate it a 4. And so the persecutory delusion it’s not bizarre. And so it’s not calling attention itself.   In addition the child’s behavior within the in the alienation narrative confirms that delusion. Okay, that the child in rejecting the targeted parents and yet being wonderful for the alienating parent and likely being wonderful at school and wonderful in the session  present is being very hyper mature, very verbal , very well-organized. This is a wonderful kid. And yet the kid the kid is really angry at this one parent.  There must be a reason for it! And since they are not generally angry, it must have something to do with this one parent.  And so the the child’s behavior confirms the delusional disorder of the persecutory inadequate target parent.  That’s its function of that child’s behavior.  It is part of the whole personality disorder process the alienating parent. And so because the child’s behavior confirms the the presentation, and because it’s an encapsulated  and because it’s not a bizarre delusion and because the child therapist typically doesn’t have much experience with psychotic disorder or recognizing delusions,  they simply miss recognizing the psychotic disorder they just simply missed the delusional disorder. Now what should have happened though is at the splitting dynamic should have alerted the child therapist to look for personality disorder and in looking for the personality disorder we should recognize the borderline narcissistic and paranoid features and when you get to the child and you begin to look at that behavior sequence of the child and realize that the child is not the victim of abuse but the perpetrator abuse begin everything begins to fall apart. And as you look at the targeted parents and you do behavioral analysis of what the interactions look like and you realize that the target apparent is totally normal range parenting, and yet you look over at the alienating parent you have this presentation of narcissistically organized inflation  and you have a splitting dynamic and you have this sort of paranoid malevolent intent  it all begins to come together.  But because the therapist missed the splitting  dynamic, because the therapist missed the the personality disorder, they will then also miss the delusional disorder. Now, I have a serious problem with that. Okay well I could understand how the diagnosis was missed, it was never the less missed. That’s a problem, because the problem is it hurts the child. It leaves the child in an enmeshed psychological relationship with us seriously disturbed parent, who has a significant axis 1 and axis 2 psychiatric disturbance. That’s going to harm the child.  In addition, in missing those diagnoses, the therapist begins to collude with the pathological process of the alienation, and so it hurts the child but also hurts the targeted parents who is the healthier parent, who is then deprived of a  relationship with their child. And so while I can understand how the child therapist missed these diagnosis, the clinical diagnosis, or the DSM diagnosis of the personality disorder  and the psychotic disorder, I can understand how they missed it, that doesn’t make it OK.   People got hurt.  If you are going do this work, you need to be competent.  It’s okay for it’s okay for a lawyer to miss recognizing a  psychotic disorder or a personality disorder,  it’s okay for our a banker to miss, or a stockbroker, but  it is not okay for psychotherapists to miss it. That’s our job.  And so what’s just to me is a l level  professional competence, and so in the next step  segment, I’m going to be discussing issues of professional risk management regarding that.”
Dr Childress Speaks with the Child – A series of 8 short videos for alienated children, each about 10 minutes long:
1. Dr Childress Speaks with the Child – Introduction


Here is an annotated list of a few of these articles from Dr Childress’ blog mentioned above:

  • Understanding the Child’s Experience   “Your child loves you with all their heart.  Your are the world to them.  They are lost.  They are living in a psychologically dangerous world of ever-changing truth and reality.  They must do what it takes to survive in the dangerous psychological world of living with the narcissistic/(borderline) parent  .We must be able to protectively separate the child from the pathology of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent before we can restore the child’s authenticity.” March 2015
  • Identifying Pathology The reluctance to want to label a parent with a personality order does great harm. Also, “under conditions of unrelieved adversity and failure, narcissists may decompensate into paranoid disorders. Owing to their excessive use of fantasy mechanisms, they are disposed to misinterpret events and to construct delusional beliefs. Unwilling to accept constraints on their independence and unable to accept the viewpoints of others, narcissists may isolate themselves from the corrective effects of shared thinking. Alone, they may ruminate and weave their beliefs into a network of fanciful and totally invalid suspicions. Among narcissists, delusions often take form after a serious challenge or setback has upset their image of superiority and omnipotence. They tend to exhibit compensatory grandiosity and jealousy delusions in which they reconstruct reality to match the image they are unable or unwilling to give up. Delusional systems may also develop as a result of having felt betrayed and humiliated. Here we may see the rapid unfolding of persecutory delusions and an arrogant grandiosity characterized by verbal attacks and bombast”
  • Re-conceptualizing Parental Alienation  This 2013 article describes the psychological and interpersonal processes of “parental alienation” from an attachment system framework.  It addresses the clinical features of “parental alienation” entirely within standard and established psychological constructs:
    • The Attachment System
    • Induced Supression
    • Inducing the child’s symptoms
    • The Child’s personality disorder symptoms
    • Parental Personality Disorder Traints
    • Mis-attribution of Meaning
    • Parental Regulation of Anxiety
    • Reenactment of Attachment Trauma
    • Treatment Implications
    • Phases of Therapy 1.) Rescue the Child 2.) Recovery of the chil’s self authenticity 3.) Restoration of the Parent-Child Relationship 4.) Reunification with the Pathogenic Parent
  • Ju-jitsu Parenting: Fighting back from the down position 2013. 23 pages. Dr Childress acknowledges that communication dynamics associated with “parental alienation” are filled with unavoidable traps and intense double-bind control dynamics. Since targeted parents are pummeled in every communication, Dr Childress offers suggestions for a different approach to parenting communication.
  • An invitation for writing collobaration  Dr Childress invites help for getting papers published in peer reviewed journals
  • Technical Discussion of Attachment Pathology: Personality Pathology and Disorganized Attachment  A Letter to Mental Health Professionals, Feb 2015.
  • How Dr Childress Diagnoses Parental Alienation  This is a more modern, attachment based model of alienation that uses concepts that are standard in Freudian Psychology
  • Childress: Documenting Attachment Based Parent Alienation in a Legal Context
  • Dr Childress Treatment (kids put in custody of targeted parents until children’s behavior improved)  How to Eliminate PA – kids put in custody of alienated parent until the alienation stops.  Mexico just passed a law so that the alienated parent becomes the custodial parent.
  • The Hostage Metaphor  I have just added another article entitled “The Hostage Metaphor” to the Parental Alienation section of my website at www.drcachildress.org. This new article discusses the processes by which the child psychologically surrenders to the psychopathology of the narcissistic/(borderline) parent, and it ends with a focus on the child protection issues associated with attachment-based “parental alienation.” This is one of my personal favorite articles, perhaps because I am giving voice to the child’s perspective.’~ Dr. C. Childress
  • Professional to professional letter – Hostile Rejecting Child VariantDr Childress lays it all out and comes closer to figuring it out than anyone else I have ever seen.   This explains the theory behind parental alienation, and everything else.  Or the hyper anxiety variant Professional to Professional Letter, Hyper-anxiety variant
  • Stark Reality   Children must first be protected from retaliation from the targeting parent before they can be expected to open an emotional connection with the targeted parent.
  • The Appointment of Minor’s Counsel Must Stop  Insightful description of the harms done to a child by the Guardian ad Litem System
  • Splitting September 2014.  When children or parents use a defense mechanism of viewing someone as 100% bad or 100% good, there is psychological distress underneath the symptom.
  • Childress – The Solution
  • High Road to Reunification
  • Finding Empowerment
  • Recovering Your Children

by Howie Dennison

The Genesis of Parental Alienation Simply Stated

splashPhoto
Chopping at the roots of a person can do irreparable harm.

Childress Overview

In brief, under the pressures and self doubts caused by a divorce, a parent with unresolved childhood family relationship trauma that left them acutely vulnerable to fears of inadequacy or abandonment can have these fears re-triggered by the divorce.

To survive their crushing emotions, the alienating parents uses 3 psychological defense mechanisms:
1.) delusion: the alienating parent creates a self delusion that the other parent is worthy of rejection and abandonment
2.) splitting: thinking their ex to be all bad
3.) projection: imagining that every personal negative feeling is a thing done by their ex.  For example, my feelings of abandonment are really my ex’s feelings of actually being abandoned.

They can say to themselves, “See, I am not the abandoned, unworthy parent.  My ex is”.

To support their self delusion, they manipulate their child to reject/abandon the other parent, thus triangulating them into the marital conflict. Once the child claims (false) victim hood status, most people and most therapists naively make the mistake of piling on against the rejected parent, therefore validating the delusion of the alienating parent, which spreads to the child

Said in another way, as excerpted from Foundations: “At its foundational core, parental alienation represents the reenactment of a false drama of abuse and victimization from the childhood of a narcissistic/borderline parent that is embedded in the internal working models of the “alienating” parent’s attachment networks.  This false drama of a the reenactment narrative is created by the the psychopathology of a narcissistic/borderline parent in response to the psychological stress of the divorce and the reactivation of attachment trauma networks as a consequence of the divorce experience. In truth, there is no victimized child, there is no abusive parent, and there is no protective parent.  It is a false drama, an echo of a childhood trauma from long ago”

Where does the American Psychiatric Association Stand on Parental Alienation?

18519685_1037891406347341_3233682747373524850_n

American Psychiatric Association on Disordered Parenting

1. The “American Psychiatric  Publishing Textbook of Personality Disorders” describes parenting from someone afflicted with borderline personality disorder, or more generally, narcissistic personality disorder:
    a. “parentify their own children”

    b. “excessively bind their children to themselves”

    c. “exert extreme possessiveness of their children and demand absolute, unlimited control over their children while threatening rejection”

    d. project their own fears onto the other parent

    e. abandon their spouse in favor of their children

    f. revive their own childhood attachment trauma after a difficult experience

    g. force a child to engage in highly pathological behaviors such as running away or attempting suicide in order to break away from parental control

Further, we wonder how a child breaks free without running away? Perhaps they are forced to give in, and surrender their authenticity and become susceptible to parental alienation?

The American Psychiatric Association also has an extremely accurate description of parental alienation in ICD-10, where all the descriptive text about shared delusional disorder fits perfectly.

2. Switching to the American Psychological Association’s book “Intrusive Parenting: How Psychological Control Affects Children and Adolescents“, by Stone, Buehler, and B. Barber, which is based on 40 empirical studies about psychological control, as noted by Dr. Childress and copied from his |Facebook page and June 2016 Newsletter

  • page 56-57: “The central elements of psychological control are intrusion into the child’s psychological world and self-definition and parental attempts to manipulate the child’s thoughts and feelings through invoking guilt, shame, and anxiety. Psychological control is distinguished from behavioral control in that the parent attempts to control, through the use of criticism, dominance, and anxiety or guilt induction, the youth’s thoughts and feelings rather than the youth’s behavior.” (p. 57)
  • page 62: “This study was conducted using two different samples of youth. The first sample consisted of youth living in Knox County, Tennessee. The second sample consisted of youth living in Ogden, Utah.”
  • page 86: “The analyses reveal that variability in psychological control used by parents is not random but it is linked to interparental conflict, particularly covert conflict. Higher levels of covert conflict in the marital relationship heighten the likelihood that parents would use psychological control with their children. This might be because both parental psychological control and covert conflict are anxiety-driven. They share defining characteristics, particularly the qualities of intrusiveness, indirectness, and manipulation.”
  • page 86-87:  “The concept of triangles “describes the way any three people related to each other and involve others in emotional issues between them” (Bowen, 1989, p. 306). In the anxiety-filled environment of conflict, a third person is triangulated, either temporarily or permanently, to ease the anxious feelings of the conflicting partners. By default, that third person is exposed to an anxiety-provoking and disturbing atmosphere. For example, a child might become the scapegoat or focus of attention, thereby transferring the tension from the marital dyad to the parent-child dyad. Unresolved tension in the marital relationship might spill over to the parent-child relationship through parents’ use of psychological control as a way of securing and maintaining a strong emotional alliance and level of support from the child. As a consequence, the triangulated youth might feel pressured or obliged to listen to or agree with one parents’ complaints against the other. The resulting enmeshment and cross-generational coalition would exemplify parents’ use of psychological control to coerce and maintain a parent-youth emotional alliance against the other parent (Haley, 1976; Minuchin, 1974)”
3. Switching to a classic book on personality disorders, entitled “Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism” by Otto F. Kernberg, 1995, page 175, he notes the inflammation of the rejected parent’s minor faux pas into “distorted monstrous fantasies”. It is delusion and reenactment is one tidy, understated, unassuming package, along with a the recipe for the all wonderful parent role: drowning children in misplaced consolation and understanding:
4. Switching to the book “Implications of Parent-Child Boundary Dissolution for Developmental Psychopathology: Who is the Parent and Who is the Child”, 2014 by Kerig, originally in the Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2005: